Kamal Hadley and Jasmine Hadley’s marriage
Noughts & CrossesKamal Hadley and Jasmine Hadley’s marriage is presented not as a private refuge but as a relationship whose accumulated resentment shapes the entire household. Kamal’s rejection of reconciliation and his plan to acknowledge their separation after the next election make explicit what his absence and contempt have long suggested: he considers the marriage finished, though its consequences continue to govern their children’s lives.
A marriage shaped by absence and resentment
The household’s ordinary routines conceal an unsettled marriage. During one family evening, Kamal initially agrees with Meggie McGregor that a quiet night at home with family is pleasant. Then, without an argument being shown, his manner changes: he approaches Jasmine, and the encounter ends with him striking her before returning inside. The abrupt shift from polite conversation to violence makes the marriage’s tension visible to Meggie, who immediately goes to Jasmine’s side.
Later, Sephy Hadley and Minerva Hadley hear their parents arguing after dinner. The sisters have been sent upstairs to do homework, which Sephy recognizes as an unusual sign that their mother wants them out of the way. She describes their arguments as rare not because the marriage is peaceful, but because Kamal is seldom home and Jasmine is often too affected by alcohol, or too restrained, to start a confrontation. Domestic quiet, in this account, is partly the product of distance and avoidance.
The dispute over Kamal’s son
The argument exposes an old injury at the center of the marriage. Jasmine says she had done her best, but acknowledges that when Kamal told her about his son, she was hurt and made a mistake by refusing to welcome the child into their home. Kamal answers that she had spent years punishing him over a son born before they met. Sephy and Minerva learn in the middle of the dispute that they have a brother, making the marital grievance a revelation about their own family history as well.
Jasmine’s regret does not repair the breach. She suggests that the two of them might begin again, while Kamal treats her earlier refusal as part of a much longer pattern of rejection. The exchange presents incompatible accounts of the marriage: Jasmine speaks from belated remorse and a wish to restore the relationship; Kamal regards the past as evidence that restoration has come too late.
Separation and the daughters
Kamal says that he has already left emotionally and that Jasmine has refused to accept this. He promises that she and the children will have what they need, and says he wants regular access to his daughters because he loves them and does not want Jasmine to turn them against him. At the same time, he plans to make their separation official after the next election. His assurance of financial provision and continued contact sits beside his declaration that he no longer wants the marriage, separating parental responsibility from marital commitment.
Jasmine responds by threatening divorce and publicity. Kamal laughs at the prospect, indicating that formal separation is not a threat to him but an outcome he welcomes. The argument makes their fracture explicit to the girls, who have been listening from the stairs; the family’s private conflict is already shaping what they know about their parents and their place between them.
Marital conflict as family power
The marriage’s damage is not confined to arguments between the adults. Kamal’s violence toward Jasmine occurs in front of Meggie, while his later estrangement and contempt form part of the home in which Sephy and Minerva grow up. His authority also surfaces when he strikes Sephy after she tells her parents she is pregnant by Callum McGregor. He then repudiates her as his daughter and orders her to have an abortion. That confrontation is not the same event as the earlier marital dispute, but it echoes the pattern of Kamal asserting control through rejection and force when family members challenge his wishes.
The novel therefore links the marriage’s private breakdown to the unequal power relations within the Hadley household. Kamal can promise provision and access while also deciding when the relationship is over; Jasmine can express regret and threaten public exposure but cannot restore a trust already lost. Their daughters encounter the effects of that imbalance in distinct ways, and Sephy’s conflict with her father shows how marital fracture coexists with, and helps frame, his broader control over family life.